By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
This paper tests whether partially unemployed workers value future preserved benefits
when they bunch at the kink of the unemployment insurance benefit-withdrawal schedule.
I extend the bunching formula of Saez (2010) to a dynamic setting that accounts
for the value of future benefits tied to taxation. This yields new tests of tax-benefit linkage
based on bunching heterogeneity. I verify in quasi-experiments that UI extension
programs that decrease the value of future benefits lead to more bunching and to lower
labor supply. Last, a quantification exercise of the dynamic bunching formula provides
extra support for a strong tax-benefit linkage.