By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Market design mechanisms are often required to be strategy-proof,
ensuring that no misreporting is profitable. This, however, may be
overly restrictive: Real-world participants may be unable to engage
in complex misreporting. In the context of school choice, this paper
proposes that mechanisms ought to be immune only to certain
“simple” misreports. While no strategy-proof mechanism Pareto
improves on the deferred acceptance mechanism, we find one under
our weaker requirement: Kesten’s (2010) efficiency adjusted deferred
acceptance. By extending our criterion to also prevent simple
“collective” misreports, we obtain characterizations of Kesten’s
mechanism. These insights contribute to practical market design.