By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
This paper offers the first systematic quantitative assessment of default-option interventions
designed to mitigate Google’s search dominance. By analyzing interventions in the European
Economic Area, Russia, and Turkey, we find that, across all three cases, changes to default
settings effectively reduced Google’s market share. The causal impact amounts to less than 1
percentage point in the EEA and over 10 percentage points in Russia and Turkey. Differences
arise from intervention nuances, including the size of the targeted users’ group, local market
characteristics, and remedy designs. We discuss the complexity of assessing the interventions’
impact on welfare deriving from quality responses.