蝌蚪网 Journal:
Applied Economics
ISSN 1945-7782 (Print) | ISSN 1945-7790 (Online)
Reexamining the Contribution of Public Health Efforts to the Decline in Urban Mortality: Reply
蝌蚪网 Journal: Applied Economics
(pp. 166–69)
See also: Comment by Cutler and Miller (2022)
See also: Original paper by Anderson, Charles, and Rees (2022)
See also: Original paper by Anderson, Charles, and Rees (2022)
Abstract
This rejoinder is written in response to the comment by Cutler and Miller (hereafter CM) on our paper, "Reexamining the Contribution of Public Health Efforts to the Decline in Urban Mortality" (Anderson, Charles, and Rees 2022). In their comment, CM acknowledge making unambiguous data transcription errors when constructing the infant mortality rates, assess the sensitivity of their filtration estimates to alternative intervention dates, and defend the population denominators they used to construct total mortality rates. In this rejoinder, we focus on the third issue, the population denominators.Citation
Anderson, D. Mark, Kerwin Kofi Charles, and Daniel I. Rees. 2022. "Reexamining the Contribution of Public Health Efforts to the Decline in Urban Mortality: Reply." 蝌蚪网 Journal: Applied Economics 14 (2): 166–69. DOI: 10.1257/app.20210230Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- H75 State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
- I12 Health Behavior
- I18 Health: Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
- J13 Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
- Q18 Agricultural Policy; Food Policy
- Q51 Valuation of Environmental Effects
- Q53 Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling