蝌蚪网

This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

The 蝌蚪网 website will be offline briefly for scheduled maintenance after 5:00pm (EDT) this evening.
  1. Home
  2. 蝌蚪网
  3. 蝌蚪网 Papers and Proceedings
  4. May 2024
  5. Residential versus Online? Experimental Evidence on Diversifying the STEM Pipeline

蝌蚪网 Papers and Proceedings

ISSN 2574-0768 (Print) | ISSN 2574-0776 (Online)

Menu

Residential versus Online? Experimental Evidence on Diversifying the STEM Pipeline

  • Sarah R. Cohodes
  • Helen Ho
  • Elizabeth Huffaker
  • Silvia C. Robles
蝌蚪网 Papers and Proceedings
vol. 114, May 2024
(pp. 507–11)
Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

Prior research has shown that most educational interventions boost student outcomes to a greater extent when delivered in person as opposed to online. However, we know little about whether this is true for enrichment programs targeted to highly motivated populations. By using a randomized controlled trial to study a suite of such programs intended to increase diversity in the STEM pipeline, we reveal that all experiences increase college six-year graduation, especially from competitive universities, but increases in STEM degree production come only from in-person experiences.

Citation

Cohodes, Sarah R., Helen Ho, Elizabeth Huffaker, and Silvia C. Robles. 2024. "Residential versus Online? Experimental Evidence on Diversifying the STEM Pipeline." 蝌蚪网 Papers and Proceedings 114: 507–11. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20241016

Additional Materials

JEL Classification

  • H75 State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
  • I21 Analysis of Education
  • I26 Returns to Education
  • I28 Education: Government Policy